Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2400
|
Posted - 2015.03.29 17:23:59 -
[1] - Quote
I like this mooring idea a lot.
I'm thinking: X-Large outposts could moor supercapitals, and all other ships can dock inside. Large outposts could moor capitals or supercapitals, and subcapitals can dock. Medium outposts would have mooring room for subcapital ships but no docking room. Small outposts would only serve as fitting service and item storage.
I don't see a problem with forcing very large ships to be visible from the outside. When the structure goes into reinforcement, the owner(s) of moored ships get to know when to show up to haul the ships away, or they could perhaps un-moor during the reinforcement timer and whisk the ships to safety before it runs out. Capital ships have somewhat of an advantage here, too, since they can jump out of a completely blockaded solar system and land in a safe spot nearby. The effectiveness of these strategies will depend largely on support from players working together.
A Caldari is just a Gallente who begged to have their civil liberties taken away.
|

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2405
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 03:37:24 -
[2] - Quote
Gevlin wrote:I would recommend to allow us to install "Decoy" Supers on the moores. Making the station look more popular than it really is and give fake intel. Sure, but naturally they should cost almost as much tritanium as a real super because, well, it's a big hunk of metal that's as big as a super. I don't know if people would bother spending that much tritanium just for a decoy though, when they could just have a real super there.
A Caldari is just a Gallente who begged to have their civil liberties taken away.
|

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2406
|
Posted - 2015.04.02 00:18:24 -
[3] - Quote
Webster Carr wrote:My Vote: Please allow docking in W-Space... :) I agree. W-space intel is supposed to be difficult to receive. You won't see someone docked just like you won't see someone cloaked. Only difference is the docked ship doesn't have to fit a cloaking device.
A Caldari is just a Gallente who begged to have their civil liberties taken away.
|

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2407
|
Posted - 2015.04.03 20:05:31 -
[4] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:Honestly, its time people stop treating their rifters like the godsent ship of Eve and allow them to get ganked by the big boys again if they try stupid things. I like the current state in which supers have no way whatsoever to destroy anything smaller than a battleship as long as it possesses so much as passive shield regen, but in the same vein I like how the subcap can't tackle the super unless it's an interdictor with specially designed equipment for doing so. Were I in charge, I'd go a step further and make it take extra warp strength to tackle any capitals, but would nerf the number of drones a carrier can put out, opting instead to buff the fighters so that 5 is plenty.
I think a small ship should be somewhat safe around only big ships, but it also shouldn't be much for then to worry about. It's purpose in being near them would be intel, and if they don't like that, they should have a subcapital support fleet to deal with it.
A Caldari is just a Gallente who begged to have their civil liberties taken away.
|
|
|